Cool Stuff
+bal
+Maddox
+gamespot
+abg saya

For convenience, press the entry number you want to go to (in increasing order).

Also included is a "Back to Top" button

: Entry 1 : Entry 2 : Entry 3 : Entry 4 : Entry 5 : Entry 6 : Entry 7 : Entry 8 : Entry 9 : Entry 10 : Entry 11

: Entry 12 : Entry 13 : Entry 14

 

Attention: New updates are written DOWNWARDS.. but there is no wrong in reading all

this good stuff all over again .

(23 Feb 2004-8:18 pm)

Assalamualaikum..

Well... I thought that I would never want to write again..

but a couple of things that happen this past few days made me wanna write again..

WHY? do you ask ?

well .. there are some things in this world that frickin' piss me off..

and when I get REALLY pissed off.. I ponder about it...

and when I ponder about stuff for a while.. somebody's gonna get blamed for it..

well..that's that..

I really want to write about something I discovered a long time ago..

proven to be correct when I attended BTN at Washington ..

and proven to be UNMISTAKABLY correct yesterday..

well you guessed it..

it's SHEER STUPIDITY of students in terms of political knowledge and allegiance..

(myself not included)

well.. I considered myself to be political inclined (which side is unimportant)..

but I JUST #%^#&% HATE it when people SHOW their political inclination

on their personal site.. because I think politics are personal stuff and better left unsaid..

-why do you say that?

well..yesterday I went to my friend's site to check out his homepage..

just a thing I do once in a week or two..

then I was SURPRISED to see the layout of his site to be completely different..

but THAT's not all the things that have changed in his site..

I saw to link to Anwar Ibrahim's clips.. two of them (which I already saw months ago)..

clips of Anwar's purported lie to the public..  where in the first clip it shows Anwar in

a wheel chair and not able to walk / being assisted in public..

and the second clip shows that behind doors.. he can walk himself..

what pisses me off is the DEGREE OF STUPIDITY shown in the comments of the visitors

(and also the webmaster).. and I automatically left a comment on the shoutbox..

(which were replied with such "finesse" )

all of them said "nasib baik la dia kena pecat (good riddance)" or "oh penipunya..

mmg patut la dia kena jail"  or something of sort..

well.. let us just think about the clip .. better yet.. let me explain about the

clip USING MY LOGICAL MIND.. something that is apparently missing in their judgment

of the clip..

 - the "lie" is in the fact that Anwar is walking and is "lying" to the public that he can't walk

and reduced to a wheel-chair..

explanation : for those of you who obviously never been to a HOSPITAL.. people are given to

sit on a wheel chair even if they have a high FEVER.. because they want to reduce movement..

it doesn't mean they CAN'T WALK.. MOFO.

and from the clip.. you can see Anwar still limping after he goes up from the wheel chair..

doesn't limping means LESS ABILITY to walk --implies--> better to sit in a WHEEL CHAIR

LARD-ASSES?

- about the comments.. I just feel sadden that the fact students are just IMBECILES about

politics. Just think logically and emphatically..

skang bila ko nampak Anwar kat "anti" kerajaan mula la nak sangka buruk..dia penipu lah..

dia suka seks luar tabii lah..

dulu masa dia kat kerajaan tak pikir macam tu pulak.. tak kesian ke kat dia.. dia dah la masuk

jail dah atas tuduhan yg masih "belum " dibuktikan sah sepenuhnya.

- I actually am not really a REFORMIST but I admit my political inclination is not towards the

government.. but to just see Anwar Ibrahim being bombed at like that is just SAD..

and of the the guy said .. "keADILan tgh berpecah la..tak tau ke"..

well Mr-I-know-it-all.. I bet i know more about keADILan and other political situations in

Malaysia more that you than your other lard-ass supporters combined.. wanna try me?

well.. I am more than happy to be engaged in a "healthy".. no profanity ..discussion with

you lot right now.. or ever..

and I am also more than willing to share "my" side of the story to all of you..

last comment: I really don't understand the mentality of you "government" supporters..

well I support the government and some of it's policies too..

but most of it are not really admirable.. did the government of you guys some personal favor

or something.? 

don't give me that "awak kena bersyukur sbb dgn duit kerajaan skarang awak dapat fly"..

well.. there's more that meets the eye guys.. and from my point of view.. if other people

are to lead malaysia during after my spm.. I would still get the opportunity to fly to the US

and the money that is used is NOT government money..

it's tax-payers money.. which my dad and your dad pays..'nuff said

Back to Top

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1:20 pm 27 Feb 2004]

askum...

saje nak tulis sumthing..

actually aku ada je nak tulis pasal satu menda..

tapi aku rasa nanti lah aku tulis pasal menda tu.. bukan sbb takot abis idea..

tapi sbb takde mood nak cakap pasal menda tu lagi ehhehe..

skang aku nak cakap pasal 3 menda yg aku PALING TAK SUKA ..

serius sume menda2 lain aku leh tahan..

e.g. orang kutuk aku.. cakap aku busuk ke.. ambik barang aku ke..

tapi 3 benda ni aku takleh tolerate :

1) Tak reti jaga barang orang

2) Tak menepati masa

3) Tak menepati janji

before all you knuckleheads out there could say "a'ah la..aku pon sebijik sama menda2 yg

aku tak suka.. " ..aku akan counter argue dengan cara kasi contoh tiap2 satu utk membuktikan

tiga2 menda yg aku takleh  tahan ni berbeza ngan cara orang lain tak tahan..

i) tak reti jaga barang..

ini mmg nombor SATU aku tak suka dalam dunia..

aku tak kisah sangat kalau macam ko pinjam barang aku..

pastu ko pulangkan dengan cara dia dah kurang kualiti skit (calar.patah etc)..

tapi aku TAK PUAS hati kalau aku pinjamkan barang kat orang tu..

pastu orang tu hilangkan / rosakkan dengan teruk..

pastu assume buleh ganti.. #%^^@$#% btul laa.. (just this particular case sahaja)

cth : "aku tak tau la sapa hilangkan game ko .. nanti aku ganti ok?"

meh aku ganti dengan penyepak sebijik nak?

aku tak kisah ngan harga sesuatu barang tu.. biar harga dia 5 ringgit pon.. and

ko nak ganti ngan 20 ringgit..

tapi the fact that ko anggap barang orang tu senang2 je buleh equal ngan nilai harga dia..

mana ko tau harga game/ cd / barang tu sama ngan harga dia..

kalau katakan cd tu bapak dia kasi sebelum dia meninggal.. tapi harga dia 5 ringgit je..

ko rasa patut tak ko bayar 5 ringgit je?

JAWAPAN: tak patut la BODOH!

even bagi barang yg sama pon.. takkan sama ngan barang yg ada sentimental value tu..

dan of course la orang tu takkan kasi tau.. "herm.. 'ekcelinya' barang tu boyfren aku yg kasi"

(at least aku tak cakap aa sbb aku tak suka demand sympathy dari orang)..

tapi at least value la sikit barang orang.. walau sekecik mana pon barang tu..

pompuan la ni biasanya buat macam barang orang tu tuk wan belah bapak dia punya..

jawapan aku : meh aku sekeh tuk wan belah bapak ko skali ngan kepala ko ..nak?

comment: aku mmg suka berdendam sampai mati.. sape yg penah buat menda2 ni

kat aku mmg aku dendam sampai mati.. nanti setel kat akhirat ok?

trivia: aku still berdendam lagi ngan budak pompuan yg repot kat cikgu sumthing aku buat

masa aku darjah 3 dulu .. you can bet on your momma's grave that aku berdendam ngan ko

kalau ko buat something (tak semestinya tiga yg atas) tu jengkelkan hati aku recently..sure

aku lagi ingat !

-lagi dua menda aku komen lain hari..

Back to Top

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[10:10 pm 28 Feb 2004]

continued from above:

ii) tak menepati masa:

ni of course la no DUA aku paling TAK SUKA dalam dunia..

tak menepati masa ni orang slalu assume :

"mesti dia ni tak suka orang tak punctual..e.g. kalau janji kol 10 .. kol 10:15 baru sampai"..

jawapannya : aku nyer tak menepati masa lain skit..

aku serius tak kisah kalau janji kol 10.. kol 10:15 baru sampai (dalam keadaan biasa)..

assuming slalunya macam nak siap2 bla2..tunggu bas..

tapi aku TAKLEH TAHAN kalau menda tu melibatkan aku secara direct.. aku boleh control

dan aku terpaksa tunggu dia instead..

e.g. "eh..15 minit lagi kita jumpa kat bawah yerk.. (kasi msg masa kat bilik)"..

katakan masa tu kol 9:45 dan aku baru je abis masak..

disebabkan dia cakap lagi 15 minit lagi jumpa.. aku pon tinggal la masakan aku tu utk

dimakan lain kali.. and aku pon siap la.. 15 minit lagi.. aku pon turun kat bawah ..

skali masa dah kat bawah tu.. aku terpaksa tunggu dia lagi 10 min baru dia siap..

itu mmg btul patut kena tendangan tanpa bayang..

kan elok kalau dia cakap tadi. "eh..aku tak siap langsung lagi la..jumpa lagi 25 minit la ok?"

buleh aku guna lagi 10 minit tadi kat atas utk makan .. BODOH..

menda ni slalu terjadi ..dan aku rasa slalu terjadi kat sume orang..

for the "unannounced" yg tak paham ape beza tak menepati masa aku ni dgn tak menepati

masa.. aku ada jawapan : GO FIGURE!

iii) tak menepati janji..

ni sebenarnya takde beza pon dengan tak menepati masa tadi..

tapi instead tukar masa ngan janji..

situation: "eh..besok kol 11 pagi kita gi makan China Gate ok?"

pastu aku pon take the liberty bangun awal kol 10.. sbb nak siap2 lagi..

(tapi slalunya aku takkan kejut orang walaupun dah janji sbb aku rasa tido tu personal

thing yg tak patut dikaco)..

skali kol 10:45 dia msg "eh.. aku tak jadi lah gi ari ni.. smalam nyer kambing gurun aku

rasa aku leh makan lagi.. takpe yerk?"

takpe MY ASS..

skarang ni.. aku dah rugi plan aku ari ni.. kemungkinan besar kalau orang lain mesti dah

cancel (tapi aku biasanya buat nya menda/ pergi mana2 sorang2)..

pastu yg lagi SIAL kalau sblum tu ada orang lain ajak "eh ko free tak esok..kita gi makan

madras masala?" dan kita terpaksa cancel sbb kita ingat nak gi China Gate..

kita la MANUSIA YG PALING DIPERMAINKAN dan RUGI dalam dunia ni..

walhal orang yg janji ngan kita tu sedap2 je makan kambing gurun (aku tau tak lawak..

tapi aku nak guna gak kambing gurun).

comment: bukan kat aku je..orang lain pon tak puas ati gak kalau kena menda2 ni so

lain kali jangan la buat macam tu BUDUH!

Back to Top

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[11:55 pm 28 Feb 2004]

Recently .. aku ada diberitahu pasal kononnya ada orang taruk "10 Things I Hate about Men"

yg cukup generic kat site derang..

knowing the superior nature of the male race over their female counterpart..

I refuse to believe but I was told.. so I went and checked out the site.. and boy was I

AMAZED!

hehe.. to the author.. hurrah and three cheers for conjuring up such a fine list of typical

(but certainly NOT applicable to me) male-related antiques..

alas... TOUGH LUCK because being the feminist (towards male) that I am..

I AUTOMATICALLY conjured up MY LIST of 10 list of thing that pisses me of (pissed is

2 degrees HIGHER than hate) about women.

1)pompuan nak attention 24 jam

- this one deserves to be on TOP of the list just because it APPLIES to all females..

sape pompuan yg tanak attention 24 jam tu.. PENIPU abis..

aku rasa kalau dunia ni aku 27 jam.. mesti derang nak attention 27 jam ..

pompuan terutama kalau berbalak.. ingat dia sorang la pompuan dalam dunia ni..

e.g. seorang balak tgh tgk tv citer polis.. awek dia tgh baring kat sebelah..

skali awek dia citer pasal kawan dia jatuh longkang ..balak dia buat tak tau.. pastu awek dia

"eh awak ni..saya cakap bukan nak dgr.. tutup la tv tu kejap"..

verdict: BEEP! sorry #$%@ .. but a cop movie is just plain COOLER than things about you and

your pitiful friends..

lagi satu..pompuan suka cakap "bagi la attention kat oraaangg.. orang tgh PMS.. bengang etc"

considerate la sikit .  oooh..kalau dia tgh PMS/ whatever laki kena considerate..

abis masa ko marah2 laki sbb ko PMS tu takpe la kiranya..tak kira la perasaan laki tu..

PMS is a condition destined for YOU to endure ..not me.. so DEAL with it !

2)pompuan ingat dunia ni "perfect" dan comel sahaja

- ni satu lagi UNIVERSAL truth.. kalau dalam ayat BI dia punya tense present tense (sbb dia

universally true) *this is a joke*

pompuan ni boleh tak stop and THINK for a while yg NOT everything in THIS WORLD

revolves around cuteness.. friendship.. sincerity..

pastu nak sume menda yg berlaku kena perfect utk dia.. takleh kurang skit pon..

kalau nak ajak kluar jalan2 tu.. kalau buleh kena siap sterika baju dia ape sume.. dukung bawak

pergi kat kereta (kalau bas jgn harap aa).. pastu kereta tu pulak dah kena get redi nak gerak..

takleh tunggu sekejap pon.. amboi.. BOLEH BLAH!  cuba la try susah skit.. ingat laki ni hamba

ko ke ?

kalau kat status tu (yes aku nak comment pasal status) messenger mesti kena taruk

status kiut sahaja kerana saya adalah seorang wanita maka suka benda kiut ..

e.g. latifah: euwww.. i like to eat ice cream.. (a status which screamss cuteness) ..

pastu macam kalau kat site/ telefon kalau buleh nak merengek2 je..

ingat laki suka la tu (well.. ada laki suka.. tapi aku nyampah)..

pastu kalau laki ada cakap.. "eh..ko tau tak..kawan aku ada kena masuk jel aa sbb isap dadah"..

pompuan mesti jawap "isk2..awak ni..takleh kawan ngan orang2 baik skit ke.. kawan2 saya

tu kan.. sume baik2 je tau".. tak pon.. "fulamak.. cool gile aa citer mamat tu kena seksa" <-- laki.

pompuan sure macam "eii.. tak suka la.. geli aaa.. buleh tak tukar channel yg ada bunga2..

pelangi serta anak2 kucing yg boleh dipeluk"..

'nuff said

3)pompuan tak reti buat lawak

- ni kalau tak sebut dalam list ni mmg tak sah.. kalau nikah tu kena ulang balik (tak sah).. :S

anyways.. pompuan mmg tak reti buat lawak..kalau sesapa tgk citer "Who's Line Is It Anyway?"

tu buleh nampak first-hand experience..

kalau guest comedian dia laki (dan menyebabkan whole cast dia laki).. mesti LAWAK gila

khinzir punya lah.. tapi kalau guest comedian dia pompuan.. baik aku tgk citer "Bendul" lagi

lawak..

pastu tgk la sendiri.. pompuan kalau buat lawak mesti macam paling kuat pon buleh sengih

nampak gigi je la.. TAPI pompuan tak reti buat lawak telah spawnkan LELAKI YG TERER

BUAT LAWAK POMPUAN.. lelaki2 begini disukai oleh pompuan dan slalu dapat kawan ngan

pompuan yg cun2 (bkn aku jeles pon tapi saje nak gtau)..

cth lawak pompuan: "eh korang.. tadi aku kluar bilik .. skit lagi aku nak jatuh tangga..

TERGEZUT gell aku (terkejut gila)" .. pompuan lain: HAHAHAHAHA...lawak nyerrrrrrr

pastu budak laki yg TERER BUAT LAWAK POMPUAN pon : hihihihi

4)pompuan ingat dia bagus dan kononnya "baik"

- ni tak la slalunya btul.. tapi GENERALLY btul la..

pompuan slalu ingat dia lagi superior dari laki..

terutama dari segi intelligence dan concentration...

kalau dapat score dalam exam lebih dari laki.. sure gembira..

tapi slalunya pompuan ni suka 'kurang bersyukur'.. konon high achiever aa tuu..

contohnya: "alaa .. tadi final exam aku dapat 91 je.. highest in class 95 .. ciss..

 sedeeyhhnyaaa wuaa".. lagi sial kalau dia cakap macam tu kat depan sorang budak laki

yg dapat 70.. rasa nak sekeh on the spot..

contoh lain kalau dalam game.. kalau laki tu dapat score 10,000 ..

dia kalau boleh nak kena dapat score 456,000.. baru puas hati..

baru dia rasa "har har har .. berjayanya aku .. aku 45.6 kali lebih power dari lelaki"..

aku kasi satu contoh je yg membuktikan pompuan nyer concentration kurang dari lelaki..

masakan: pompuan suka boast bahawa derang terer masak.. tapi kenapa MAJORITY

three stars chefs kat dunia dan orang masak orang kawin LELAKI?

masakan (dgn sempurna) memerlukan tedious amounts of precision dan concentration..

an attribute proven LACKING in the human being with XX chromosomes..

dari segi kononnya baik tu.. mmg btul pon..

pompuan aku tak suka aa kalau kena kasi impression bahawa..

aku "pompuan melayu".. jadi aku kena 'berlagak' bahawa aku baik. pemalu..

tunduk2 .. sambil menjaga tata tertib yg lain..

kalau baik btul tu takpe gak.. ini kalau yg macam depan laki kena senyum2 control..

buat2 segan konon. pastu kat belakang ngan geng2 dia duduk mengangkang.. gelak

kurang skit je dari pontianak .. serius aku nak lempang..

aku yet to find budak melayu (kat USA ni) yg aku btul2 respek sebagai having the "true"

essence of a nice malay girl ..kalau ada pon.. dah ada menda yg budak tu buat utk cancel

aku punye good pre-assumption aku terhadap dia...

pastu aku paling nyampah kalau pompuan kalau laki cakap pasal seks/ menda lucah..

nak kena "eiiii.. buleh TAK kalau tak cakap pasal menda tu.. oraaangg gelliiiiii"..

macam TABOO laa tu konon.. taboo mah behind..

aku tak cakap bahawa cakap pasal seks tu bagus (in fact aku pon tak suka) tapi takyah

la nak kena berlagak macam kalau orang cakap ko nak kena rasa GELI lebih2.. lempang nak?

5)pompuan suka demand equal rights padahal paham2 la ko tu mmg tak layak nak dapat

equal rights.

- ni satu lagi yg aku bengang..

jarang berlaku (tapi ada kadang2) kat budak2 baya aku .. dan slalu dilihat dekat

pompuan2 yg dah "enlightened" macam dah jadi businesswoman.. orang kaya..

yang tak sedar dek untung..

pompuan2 macam ni patut kena crucify macam Jesus dalam filem the Passion (baru tgk

smalam..nanti nak komen pasal tu).. baru sedar..

mesti nak macam "tau tak pompuan ni kena tindas.. bla2 .. kami mahu sume menda yg lelaki

dapat ..kami dapat"

oooh.. nak sume menda yg laki dapat yer?

ok la camtu.. nanti aku tulis surat kat kerajaan nak suruh buat tandas tempat kencing pompuan

macam tempat kencing laki.. baru adil kan?

TAU PON TAK ADIL ..BUDUH.. ooh..kalau bab2 pompuan untung. nak je dia lebih..

pastu kalau nak lagi SIAL.. pompuan2 yg suka soal hukum2 ALlah.. macam

Sisters in Islam etc.. "kenapa slalu nak dijadikan hal sangat pakai tudung.. pompuan kena

kasi liberal rights etc2"..

serius pompuan macam ni aku doakan dapat azab pedih kat akhirat.period.

last comment: pompuan aku tak paham kalau sesapa yg pakai tudung tapi tak reti pakai

baju lengan panjang.. aku pakai baju lengan panjang almost everyday gi skolah.. tak rasa leceh

pon.. ALlah tak perintah aku tutup lengan.. tapi ALlah perintah ko.. so TUTUP LA BUDUH..

6)pompuan suka bitch about small things serta emotional

- menda ni aku malas cakap banyak ..tepuk dada and bitch about it yourselves..

pompuan kalau lelaki (dan pompuan lain) buat menda skit jer.. mula la nak pot pet pot pet

macam menda ni big deal sangat..

cth: kalau katakan masa masa tiba2 laki cakap "eh.. smalam kat tv ada eksiden aa..

abis terburai perut mamat tu.. bla2 (dgn penuh grafik dan teliti)"..

mesti pompuan macam "awak ni .. orang tgh makan la potpetpotpet..geli tau "..

benda yg sama akan berlaku kalau cakap menda2 lucah atau basically buat je lah ape menda

skali pon.. mesti pompuan nak sound.. ape sound2 ..ingat sound engineer ke..

pastu katakan bila pompuan tgk sesuatu yg dia tak suka / atau dia suka..

mesti nak kena kasi tau dengan penuh perasaan..

cth: ari tu masa kena rogol.. ada kena WANITA umno kasi cadangan supaya KASI

sume perogol kanak2.. nice suggestion Einsten.. aku pon ada suggestion..

rather than potong that part the male anatomy.. ape kata kalau kita potong tangan.. kaki ..

serta sebat.. better yet.. why not call that HUDUD .. dah ada undang2 hudud tanak follow..

7)pompuan suka pandang rendah lelaki..tapi kalau lelaki pandang rendah kat dia lelaki tu

sexist

- haa.. ni pon satu lagi menda btul tapi jarang diakui oleh kaum Hawa..

point ni sebenarnya berkaitan ngan point "pompuan ingat dia bagus tadi"..

dan jugak "pompuan nak equal rights" ..tapi aku nak asingkan gak hehe..

pompuan ni suka pandang rendah kat lelaki.. dalam sume aspect..

grooming.. pelajaran.. sukan... gaya macam konon derang la paling superior dalam sume

hal.. pastu suka kasi condescending comments macam .. "korang ni (laki) buleh tak

kalau jadi sensitif skit macam kitorang.." ataupun .."boys buleh tak kalau jaga kebersihan

skit..korang ni busuk laa euwwwww..."

ni satu lagi aku nak kasi penyepak..

pastu konon kalau dalam sukan.. "kalau lelaki buleh buat..kenapa kitorang takleh buat?!!"

maka lelaki2 penakut dalam dunia ni pon buatlah "women's" football..

basketball.. takraw (?!) dan sebagainya..

pastu bila ada lelaki komen .. "eh.. women's volleyball kena pakai sluar pendek baru

dapat tarik penonton" <-- komen pervert (i'm not endorsing this type of behaviour)

pastu mula la melenting.. "oooh laki ni gatal la.. jgn la amik kesempatan kat pompuan bla2..

kitorang nak play sports sbb nak show "competitiveness" ..competitiveness my ass..

kan elok in the FIRST PLACE takyah nak menggatal nak mintak2 sukan macam lelaki..

bila kena pakai macam laki tau pulak nak komplen.. buduh.

8)pompuan suka jealous tak tentu hala

- ni satu trait pompuan yg aku slalu tak paham..

ni mesti sbb terpengaruh ngan bidalan orang tua2..

"cemburu tandanya sayang".. memang..cemburu mmg tanda sayang..

tapi kalau jeles tak tentu hala tu..you tell me..

there's a fine line between sayang and paranoia.. and women can't seem to see that line..

kalau balak dia / lelaki yg dia minat dilihat tgh cakap ngan pompuan lain yg tak kenal..

(atau takyah dilihat pon.. dgr member citer pon cukup)..

sure macam "arghhh.. abis la ko.. menyesal aku curahkan 120% cintaku padamu..

ini yg kau balas pada aku yerrrr.."

pastu merajuk 3 jam 60 (melayu's 24-7). pastu bila laki tu tanya..ape hal ni..

"awak tahuu pasal apaaaa..."

kalau laki bini: dgr je kawan sekerja suami dia citer.. "ehh temah.. tgh hari tadi aku nampak

laki ko ngan secretary dia makan laa.. baik ko tanya dia balik kang" <-- which suggests

another characteristic; "pompuan suka ngumpat" but I won't go there..

bini: (sambil sinsing lengan).."abis la suami aku.. balik ni aku tunggu depan pintu ngan

kayu penyapu.. baru setahun kawin dah pandai menggataaallll eiiiiii"

solution aku: kiss my @$$.. maleh nak melayan.. cari awek/kawan/bini baru lagi bagus..

9)pompuan materialistik

- ni patutnya kat atas list tadi sbb this is UNDENIABLY true ..

tapi sbb aku dah terpikir pasal menda ni lambat.. so.. bear with it ...

pompuan ni.. cukup suka kalau dapat barang/ duit/ material..

tak tau la apsal.. sbb tu la wujudnya istilah "pompuan pisau cukur"..

i'm not implying sume pompuan 'pisau cukur' tapi at varying degrees.. sume pompuan suka

kalau dapat barang free.. menda ni semakin apply kalau berboyfren..

pastu lagi slalunya bukannya nak fikir pon kalau lelaki tu tgh takde duit ke ape..

tau nak dapat barang..sedap dia je.. pastu pada pandangan pompuan..

laki yg kasi barang lagi mahal lagi tinggi aa status.. pandai "pamper" derang..

cth : "eh.. btul ke you kasi cincin $300 ni kat i.. i rasa segan la nak terima (padahal dalam

hati yes! yes! dapat cincin yea yea)"

laki tu sure "puasa" bulan tu sebab dah abis elaun sebulan kasi kat awek dia cincin

yg lepas dah seminggu dia taruk kat mana ntah pon tak tau.. tak value pon..

patut lepas laki tu kasi hadiah.. bila pompuan tu ngada kasi 'hadiah' penampar sebijik..

10)they just plain suck..period.

- the above sentence basically self-explanatory .. 'nuff said.

side note: pompuan kenapa la suka sangat taruk status messenger yg macam bagus and nak

imply cuteness serta demand sympathy..

cth: "pliiiiizzzz .. DND (do not disturb) 2 exams coming upppppp..msg me at 12"

atau pon "tgh main dengan seekor tupai.. comeinyaaa geraaammmm"

atau "orang tgh demam.. sakit :("

well.. aku LANGSUNG TAK DISTURBED pon.. tapi just nak kasi tau bahawa orang lain pon

ada gak exams .. aku pon demam gak  (FORTUNATELY aku tak main ngan seekor tupai)..

comment:  all the purpoted 10 things are generalizations stop being a pussy about it..

I am not doing this list to incite personal anger towards the author or any other individual..

just to put things in perspective bahawa pompuan jangan la ingat laki je sucks..

korang pon suck ...

Back to Top

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[12:48am 2/3/2004]

ari khamis ari tu aku gi tgk 3 movie.. dan aku rasa inilah combo 3 movie paling best

pernah aku buat..

just for mentioning.. aku bayar tiket 2 kali  (tapi tgk 3 movie hehe) ..slalunya bayar 1 tiket je..

tapi serius rasa berbaloi..

citer yg aku tgk.. The Passion (of Christ).. Lost in Translation ngan Cold Mountain..

2 daripada citer tu nominated for Best Picture kat Academy awards smalam.. dan

The Passion is equally superb. bukan bayar utk tgk citer macam Eurotrip.. Old school dan

seantaranya (aku tak penah bayar tiket utk citer bodoh2.. kalau aku tgk pon sbb

dia dalam satu wing movie yg penah aku tgk),,

for you idiots out there yg rasa "mamat ni dulu sound orang taruk lirik lagu/ movie/ etc

tapi dia buat gak" -> lepak la dulu.. baca sampai abis.. at least aku takde la taruk..

"eiii.. bestnya.. last weekend orang tgk citer xxxxx .. best gell"..

for you intellects who is wondering where the HELL this is going.. bear with me for a minute..

aku kali ni nak cakap pasal the Passion.. and i'm not gonna bore the crap out

of you by giving a review on the movie.. because you can get much better reviews than mine..

but I am gonna share with you what I felt during and after I watched that movie..

and how it made me think about it so much that I myself is amazed on how much a

theological epic can give you such an impact..

Disclaimer: This picture does not depict what I think and does not

necessarily represent the real prophet. Just as an image of the movie.

well.. to start with.. I want to take a quote from an interview with Mel Gibson (producer and

director) : "I want this movie to be shocking" .. well ..he shocked the be'jesus' (pun intended)

out of everybody with the amount of violence that is shown in the movie. well.. I can honestly

say this is the MOST violent movie I have ever seen (not including snuff films) and I think

it should have been given an NC-17 rating instead of an R (R stands for restricted.. under

17 requires parental guidance.. NC-17 is strictly for mature audiences above 17).

Mel Gibson said that the violence was necessary to portray Jesus' suffering (the word Passion

in Latin means suffer.. hence the title) and I cannot agree more with Mr. Gibson.

where in Jesus' name is this going?

well.. I just want to say that the sheer violence in the movie made me stop and think. Is this

what the real Jesus (and I mean the prophet Isa a.s) went through and if it this is what the real

prophet went through.. how can we as Muslims (and worshippers) can make this as a

lesson?

*NEW UPDATE:  the article about Isa al-Masih is MOST PROBABLY invalid because

it contains major discrepancies and may be the work by the Christians to subconsciously

indoctrinate the Muslims.. so I have withdrawn it.. ni link lain --> sini

my point: what I am trying to say that.. the prophet went through a lot of hardship..

and he did that because God intended for it to be so.. but it shows how much the prophets

SACRIFICED themselves for the fate of their ummah / race..

I'm not all for the Christian's belief that "Jesus died FOR our sins".. but Jesus and the other

prophets (especially the Ummul 'Azmi) did SACRIFICE their entire time, money, lives

(and death) towards conveying the TRUE message towards their followers

and all people.. but we nowadays.. living in the BUSYNESS of our modern

pathetic lives can't even fathom this level of sacrifice and how important sacrifice is

in SATISFYING God and towards getting into His paradise. Do you think that

God will give the prophet His blessing (redha) if he just stood there like us.. studying..

watching television.. playing.? and do you think we as worshippers in the days of fitnah

and fasad will get God's blessing by just doing the 5 prayers everyday?

well you SMART ALECS out there mesti cakap "ala.. aku stadi.. makan minum pon ibadah gak"

ooh.. ibadah ke? i see.. kiranya mmg tiap2 kali sebelum belajar.. makan.. minum..

mmg ko niat la / doa? ke belajar sbb nak exam?

aku bukan nak su'ul dzan/ sangka buruk kat sini.. cuma aku nak nasihatkan diri aku dan

korang skali yg slalu stadi.. makan ..minum tak niat / doa supaya kita sama2 KORBAN

masa, tenaga, harta utk AGAMA ALlah dan utk gembirakan ALlah swt..

waLlahu a'lam bissawab

Back to Top

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[8/3/04 2:01 am]

assalamualaikum..

again I am forced to venture into the realm that I least want to venture into..

but due to some unavoidable circumstance.. need to be touched..

yes.. that realm is the realm of POLITICS..

I always write about SHIT all the time. but now I want to show that I too can ponder

upon the things that you PSEUDO-intellectuals ponder and claim to know a lot of..

politics..

(no GREEN party fanatic.. I'm not talking about that upcoming Kerry vs Bush thingy..

although I can write and talk about that too)..

I really hate talking about politics.. I really do..

Even amongst friends I rarely open the topic of politics..

because for me.. politic is a VERY personal matter and can even differ between

husband and wife.. mother and child ..

With that said, I cannot and would not deny the fact that politics is a very important

aspect to know about and seems to be a TABOO word in the current student class..

(which includes yours truly).. but it seems those who DO immerse themselves in

student-politics really made me think "Isn't there any people out there who really can

lead people and who for God's sake just darn impress me?"

Alas. the obvious answer is NO.. there aren't.. and no I'm not talking about

those people currently leading our country right now.. I talking about those

'aspiring' leaders that are currently WANTING to lead our country in another

10-15 years (maybe sooner)..

today, I want to put into perspective both sides of the student-politic organizations..

pro to the government and against the government..

both of these organizations are currently present in the United States and I had the

chance to personally know people who are currently active in these organizations..

I don't want to explicitly judge these two organizations separately..

nor do I want to iterate their motives and names..

my intention is to just mention my view and DISLIKES about their political antics..

comment : these attributes also apply to the ADULT leaders in a greater degree..

but just for discussion's sake.. I will say that this applies to the student-politician.

1) They always show their FANATICISM

- this is the eminent point of being on A SIDE of the feuding parties.. you need to show your

ENTHUSIASM by hyper-fanaticism. I don't understand why you need to "cling on" to your

party that much and show it PUBLICLY.

for instance.. the student association here that supports PAS PUBLICLY show on their

website the PAS emblem and "mendokong kepimpinan ulama" motto.. which automatically

arises questions among the 'inspectors' who are just waiting to prey and tell the government

about the who's who in the anti-government movement. Please use basic ^%#&# common

sense. You are sponsored by the CURRENT ruling government.. and even I .. who is not

all thrilled about that fact.. is accepting it. Be smart. and be thankful also. This comment is

not to support the government.. it is just that there is a fine line between stupidity,

 ungratefulness and doing what's right.. and most of those guys seems to be missing the line.

On the other side of the table, the pro government clique also PUBLICLY

shows their association with the ruling government, and there is nothing wrong with that..

or is it?! (kat sini tukar cakap BM)

Akta Universiti 1971 (pindaan 1974) melarang mana2 pelajar dan pertubuhan menyatakan

sokongan, simpati atau bangkangan terhadap sebarang politik, kesatuan sekerja atau badan-

badan lain (disamping usul2 lain) dan menurut seorang pemimpin (yang saya sendiri dgr

ucapannya) akta ini berkuatkuasa kepada semua pelajar dalam dan luar negara..TETAPI

menurut dia lagi .. kelab2 UMNO dibenarkan kerana ia sebuah PERTUBUHAN KEBAJIKAN..

quote "Kita taruk nama Kelab Umno .. supaya senang Umno nak bagi bantuan"

pastu tiba2 dia putar belit pulak "kalau PAS nak buat kelab kebajikan.. dia buleh buat..

tapi sesiapa masuk kena tangkap" <-- now you tell me that's justice or just-crap.

2) They always want to debate

I don't know why that is.. but the leaders of student organizations that support (or defy)

the government must have a "debating" nature inside them..

whether there are from a debate team.. or just plain like to debate..

Personally.. debaters and debates are one of the three things I hate MOST

about high-schoolers (the other two are rugby players and people playing in the band..

but we will talk about that another day)..

and these people (student-politicians) seems to ALWAYS want to resolve something in

a debate or debate-like nature (cakap je 'bincang' .. lepas tu sama je macam debat)..

maybe they've got the tendency to do that from their OLDER counterparts..

just look at the PAS-BN relationship.. everything that they want to settle will end up in a

suggestion for a debate .. and then IF they do debate.. they end up not resolving anything..

the thing I don't like about debates (I never watch them.. EXCEPT the democrats debate)

even educational / religious ones is because

i) they don't resolve anything (as I've said above)

ii) they will incite anger and hate because the purported 'loser' of the debate will

automatically be frustrated and in the end hate the 'winner' more .. instead of ending

with a resolution of issues.

It's like a Mobius band of continuous hatred towards the pro and contra of the discussed

issue and in the end.. nobody frickin' wins. <-- verdict: pure stupidity.

3) Blind following (membuta tuli / membabi buta) = ignorance

well.. let's get this over with..

this is VERY apparent in all the student-political lackeys..

sad to say.. I am very DISAPPOINTED  towards the level of ignorance shown by people

in this venture (who supposedly knows a lot about politics.. but in reality they know ZILCH

about it)..

most of them (to their credit) have some knowledge about their party's political agenda

and their struggles.. but (as I know of) NONE of them seems to know (or for that matter ..CARE)

about what the other political party's agenda is about.

no.. I'm not saying this out of spite.. or assumption..

let's just take on example : (I have no permission to reproduce this excerpt but I'm doing

it anyway just to illustrate my point)

-> saya nak minta penjelasan saudara berkenaan satu aspek pelaksanaan

 hukum hudud ini berdasarkan perkara berikut (saya diberi maklumat ini oleh seorang rakan

pengerusi Kelab UMNO di UK):

Mengikut hukum hudud, terdapat 15 perkara yang wajib ada pada hakim:

1 lelaki bukan perempuan
2. sihat seluruh tubuh anggota
3. tidak pekak
4. tidak bisu
5. tidak pernah melakukan dosa dosa besar
6. tidak pernah melakukan dosa dosa kecil
7. tahfiz
 

(and the author won't go on about the other 8 things)

let us think LIBERALLY (which I always do) and look at the list for a moment..

even with MY level of ignorance and incompetence.. I automatically knows that there is

a wrong criteria listed there..

and considering this comes from PENGERUSI Kelab UMNO U.K (ooh.. that name just

gives you the chill doesn't it?).. and quoted by an individual of similar position (in the US)..

I was utterly surprised ..but at the same time.. not surprised...

(?) why are you not surprised ? some of you may ask .. (because of my already said point

dumbass.. because of IGNORANCE and refusal to accept and improve on it)..

back to the criteria.. what's wrong with it ..?

well.. no 5 and no 6 states that the judge needs to be FREE from making a kinds of sin..

regardless whether it is small or big (and the author continues to reiterate on these points..

saying that it is impossible to obtain such persons)

the correction: no 5 and no 6 are included in the ADIL criteria.. which states that "they should

not be committing large sins and seldom does small sins" .. maknanya "tidak melakukan

dosa besar dan beringan2an terhadap dosa kecil" <- there you go.. 'nuff said.

If people of status can't show their followers the importance of knowing stuff BEFORE

debating (point 2) about it.. I don't know what to say.. except "be prepared malaysia..

there will be stupid politicians taking over in another 10 years".

comment: I won't link the site that states the above comment.. if you really want to

know about the site.. find it yourself..

I rest my case.

Back to Top

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[12:52 am .. 15 March]

Actually .. I am writing this just after I wrote the third point above..

but what the heck.. after a week.. I think it is already waaay to long not to say

something to the world..

aku saje nak kasi tau bahawa walaupun aku penah bukak site dah dulu.. and byk gak dah

menda aku dah tulis dulu.. aku ada HAK nak tulis balik sume menda yg aku tulis balik dulu..

bukan sbb aku takde idea.. cuma sebab these things are a constant bother..

and some of the stuff aku rasa rugi kalau sesetengah pembaca tak dapat baca (so.. to people

who already read this website from long agoo.. bear with the repetition okay?)..and one of

the examples of re-instatement of previous materials are below (re-written)

aku nak restate pasal 3 menda yg aku tak suka .. daripada yg atas..

1) debaters

2) rugby

3) band

this list is in no particular order.. I hate them all JUST AS MUCH.

the nature of the mind demands an enquiry .. so people might enquire.. why and what's

with the hate to all of those mentioned?

well.. I want to first say .. what I hate about the three stuff is NOT the nature of each of them

(though I do hate their respective nature.. but not as much) but because of the social

strata that they represent in HIGH SCHOOL..

I am schooled in a day school in Junior High (ye laa..ye laa.. form 1 sampai 3 hehe) and

from form 4-5 in MRSM.. so I haven't had the liberty to participate in any of the above mentioned

myself (not that I want to.. just for saying's sake).. because generallly all of the above things

surfaces from SBP (sekolah berasrama penuh for short)..  *walaupun tak semestinya*

and God do I thank you for that..and I know enough people from all these categories

to incite hate towards them..

question: ok2.. aku paham yg ko tak dapat masuk sume menda2 tu.. tapi apsal tak suka?

well.. aku TAK SUKA sbb aku benci budak2 skolah menengah yang masuk menda2 tu

mesti nak BERLAGAK macam derang tu TINGGI sangat dari orang lain..

"wah wah ..saya masuk debate seyh.. maka saya sama taraf dengan pengawas atau

badan perwakilan pelajar" <-- sama taraf my ass..

kalau korang kenal budak2 yg masuk menda tu.. sure nyer la mesti kononnya 'distinct'

pastu seolah2 sama taraf ngan pengawas etc..

contoh : "ooh.. budak Tijah tu budak debate dulu.. (dgn penuh kagum) ..sbb tu

dia dapat pakai blazer kalau kuning (contoh) masa Piala PM" <-- so?

kalau budak2 dalam menda2 tu.. mesti nak macam "converge" ngan orang2 yg penah

terlibat ngan menda2 tu je.. pastu gaya macam orang2 lain yg tak terlibat akan

kagum secara otomatik ..

contoh "ooh.. korang dulu main snare ye.. aku main bass.. kitorang dulu masa

band competition dapat no 2 .. huiyoooo"

ataupon "aku dulu ruggerz kat skolah.. kitorang dapat masuk semi Premier Cup..

skolah korang macam mane?" <-- ruggers my ASS..

aku serius BENCI gila ngan perangai derang ni..

gaya macam konon 'saya special' ngan gaya macam konon2 budak2 lain duduk stadi je..

kitorang pon ada persatuan gak.. ada badan beruniform gak..

aku takde aa lepas skolah (atau masa skolah).. nak jumpa budak skolah lain.. pastu

bukak citer "eh.. aku dulu kelab pingpong kat skolah aku.. skolah ko dulu amacam?"

sebut lepas skolah.. satu lagi aku benci ngan budak2 3 kategori (debaters.. rugby ngan band..

kena tulis balik.. takot lupa yg aku benci)... mesti nak terlibat / amik tau pasal menda2 derang tu

lepas dah ABIS SKOLAH..

e.g. (perbualan ini adalah 2 tahun selepas SPM) "eh.. tahun ni korang tanak gi tgk band

skolah kita main ke kat pertandingan band.. aku dgr Cikgu Peah kata tahun ni gempak"

.. tak pon "eh.. tahun ni skolah kita masuk Piala PM la.. si Mamat tu gempak siot debat"

ataupon (*insert joke here* menang piala negeri aa ragbi)..

sedar2 la skit bang / kak.. diri tu dah TUA.. takyah nak gatal2 amik tau pasal menda2 tu dah..

aku serius tak amik tau dah pasal skolah (kecuali keputusan peksa je.. itu pon takde la nak

bangga kalau skolah aku dapat no 1 ke ape)

comment: I know for all of you who DID get into these shit really make it a big deal of it..

e.g. TRADITION bla2.. but SAVE IT ok? I just want to say that stop being such a SNOBE

just because you were in some bullshit organization and thinks that you have a skill

that nobody else have.. well.. other people have their own skills.. but they don't make a big

fuss about it.. so.. shut your traps as well ok?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[20/3 11:30pm]

well..

here I'm up and running again..

walaupun aku dah lama tak update...

tak aku takkan tulis "sori la kengkawan.. saya dah lama tak update .. saya byk keja skola

maaf ye?"

pegi mampus.. orang lain pon byk gak keja skolah..tapi takde aa nak berlagak..

pastu gaya macam update tu nak kena slalu atau 'consistent'..

pegi mampus aa kalau ramai orang baca pon site/blog ko..

takyah nak rasa bersalah2 pulak kalau tak update..

kalau peminat blog ko tu masuk..pastu ko tak update lagi ..

takde la dia nak menggelupur2 dgn penuh perasaan hampa.. dia relak je.. most probably..

besok dia masuk lagi.. dan lagi.. dan lagi.. abis.

ari ni aku nak cakap pasal pompuan2 baik..

sebenarnya nak cakap pasal budak2 baik..tapi tak jadi..

sbb pompuan2 baik lagi best nak critique dari budak2 baik hehe..

aku kenal ramai budak2 baik ni..

bila aku cakap 'baik'.. aku maksudkan budak2 yg Islamic (specifically budak2 yg

aktif persatuan agama)..

aku mmg respek gila kat sape2 yg baik ni.. dan aku harap derang doakan aku jadi baik gak..

tapi aku tgk.. budak2 pompuan yg baik ni..

suka sangat pandang serong kat orang lain.. sangka buruk

terutama kalau orang tu 'nampak' tak baik / biasa.. tak sebaik dia..

ni bukan terhad pada budak2 pompuan baik kat US je..

kat mana2 pon sama..

ni aku nak petik salah satu blog budak pompuan baik..

tapi dia punya nasihat tu dgn penuh 'hikmah'

>Sampai hari ni saya rasa tafsir ni paling best. Haritu jalan-jalan kat Masjid India, tengok kat Bajrai, harga tafsir ni dah dekat RM100. Tapi still boleh tawar.. namun apalah RM100 tu, bandingkan dengan harga sofa yang jadi tempat letak punggung je kat rumah kita..? Atau langsir2 satin, atau karpet setebal 5-6 inci utk kita pijak2 je tu. Isk,, beli 10 pun takpe kan? Sedekah kat budak2 yang dok ngaji lagi, banyaknya pahala!! (Asalkan niat kita ikhlas, itulah jaminan kebahagiaan & ketenangan hati.. boleh ke tenang kalau sedekah sebulan gaji? Mesti teringat-ingat... eiii, hutang kereta tak bayar lagi, hutang rumah, hutang kawan, hutang itu...hutang ini.... banyaknya hutang....try la. Tapi kalau tak tenang gak, jangan marah saya.. tu mesti tak ikhlas tu,,,
hehehehe....)
 

(note: I have the utmost respect to the author of this website but I just want to make a point

and no condescending feelings towards the author)

comment: Dalam perenggan ni.. penulis tu cuba nak terangkan tentang tafsir Al-Quran..

dan penulis cuba menggunakan unsur sindirian (cynism) utk menarik perhatian pembaca..

tapi cuba kita lihat ayar terakhir tu.. apsal nak kena tulis "kalau tak tenang gak .. tu mesti

tak ikhlas tu".  Aku tau dia nak buat unsur gurauan.. tapi tak tahu ke kalau sesape yg

mmg fit dgn criteria (terpikir hutang) tu baca.. tak ke dia terasa?

takleh ke kalau nak sangka baik.. cth:

"harga tafsir ni dah dekat RM100.. namun apelah RM100 ni kalau ni kalau nak dibanding

dgn balasan ALlah di akhirat sana.. janji niat kita ikhlas" (kalau nak taruk pasal kapet tu ke

sofa satin ke .. kain batik Langkawi pon bleh..ikut la ko nak taruk ape lagi janji takyah mention

yg last tu) <-- kan lagi baik camni..

Aku just nak cakap general la.. laki ke ..pompuan ke.. jadah ke..

yg baik2 tu ..kalau buleh sangka baik la kat orang.. (husnul dzan)..

jgn ingat sbb orang lain tak tunjuk baik.. orang lain tak buat usrah..

orang lain tak pegi program.. ko lah orang paling baik dalam dunia ni..

 jaga supaya tak sum'ah (ujub ke ria' ke..tak kisah la)..

lagi satu jangan rasa macam kalau ko dah pegi program agama tu..

ko lah orang yg paling pandai nasihat.. dgn penuh hikmah..

byk lagi nak belajar .. orang yg buat dakwah bukan nak dakwah orang lain..

tapi dakwah diri sendiri .. sbb telinga kita paling dekat dgn diri kita..

suka ke kalau kita cakap kat diri kita sendiri dgn penuh sangka buruk.. ?

pikir sendiri.. 'ALlahu a'lam

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[29/3 9.00 pm]

ni sambung dari atas.. petikan :

Assalamualaikum wrwb

Maaf,harap dapat beri penjelasan,kalau *** *** silap.
Adakah midwest yang *** maksudkan program yang msd
anjurkan yang bercampurgaul lelaki dan perempuan tu?
yang *** *** dapat cerita ada permainan gabung lelaki
dan perempuan satu pasukan?Kalau itulah yang
dimaksudkan *** *** tidak bersetuju samasekali untuk
buat jualan di situ untuk dana ***** atau ****.Ianya
seolah kita juga menyokong atau bersubahat dengan cara
gaya mereka.Matlamat tidak menghalalkan cara.
Jika ada sesiapa yang hendak pergi pastikan anda ada
missi da'wah.Jalankan amar ma'ruf nahi munkar.Jika
tidak kita akan dikira sama dengan mereka.s6/68-73
Jika bi'ahnya solehah,silakan dan syabas kerana
sentiasa berfikir untuk islam.
Maaf kepada semua ahli ****** ***** kerana *** ***
terlalu mendiamkan diri di mailing list ini.Maaf
terutama kepada ******* dan *****.

ni satu lagi contoh aku nak kasi orang yg suka cakap dgn penuh sangka buruk / pancung. aku

rasa nak penampar aa orang yg suka 'pancung' bila orang lain cakap menda yg kononnya tak

elok. contoh :

a: eh smalam kau tgk tak pertandingan miss universe?

b: aku taknak tgk pertandingan miss universe sbb nanti kat akhirat aku tanak tuhan taruk

air panas kat mata (cth)

tak reti nak cakap elok2 ke? Macam perenggan kat atas.. disimpulkan bahawa dia untuk

menjelaskan bahawa pertubuhan tu enggan membuat jualan di Midwest.  Aku pon tak setuju

pasal midwest games tapi ape perasaan penganjur bila dapat reply macam tu? (assuming

dia reply kat penganjur). As if kononnya orang tak tau la pulak sblum ni midwest ni

co-ed (and anjuran MSD) and needs reminding.

aku sure aa masa penganjur tu hantar email..dia takde la pulak cakap

"eh korang pertubuhan yg slalu macam bagus pastu ingat korang pandai sangat

dakwah sbb slalu cakap berhikmah ngan tulis hadis sume dalam BI konon power aa tu...

boleh tak bukak gerai jualan kat midwest tahun ni..thanks" <-- ni cth je..tak semestinya

melambangkan perasaan aku hehe

kalau dia tulis macam tu.. aku takleh kata ape aa. tapi ni ko pandai pulak nak suruh

"sesiapa nak pegi nanti kena ada missi da'wah.. amar ma'ruf dan nahi mungkar". patutnya

ko jadi asbab penganjur tu dapat hidayat dgn cara nasihat elok2.. at least penganjur tu

buleh la terfikir "ooh..btul gak.. tahun ni nak cuba kawal la skit". ini jadi mudharat pulak..

sbb penganjur tu dah benci ko..

aku NGAKU bahawa aku tak 100% sure dari mana atau ape tujuan sebenar

keratan di atas.. tapi aku just nak say in context.. yg lain kali kena ada fikir risau bimbang

macam mana umat nak amal agama dulu .. then baru nasihat.. baru la takde pancung2..

ni tau nak condemn orang je.

trivia :

ni nampak katana aku.. sape suka sangat pancung2 ni.. meh .. datang bilik aku

3303 Lee House kat Umich.. aku pancung ngan katana ni.. bawak skali mangkuk

nak tadah kepala ko.. sbb bilik aku takde mangkuk besar.. lagi bagus kalau ko bawak skali

kain nak lap darah.

Back to Top

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[29/3 9:20 pm]

aku sambung terus dari entry atas..malas nak tunggu lama2..

sbenarnya menda ni lama dah aku terpikir..saje je malas tulis..actually aku nak cakap pasal

tendency sesetengah orang taruk ayat Quran/ hadis / translation dan seantara dgnnya

dalam English..

comment: aku actually suka and puji sesape pon yg taruk Hadis/ ayat Quran / translation
 

kat site ke ape.. sbb nowadays it seems that nobody does that anymore (termasuk la aku
 

..bukan tanak taruk..tapi sbb nak keep tone site ni macam spontaneous outbursts
 

..tanak islamic.. ni pon dah byk entry yg komen islamic *don't misunderstand this statement*)
 

TAPI.. aku just rasa utk site2 yg Melayu-oriented..yang target group dia melayu.. macam site2

discussion islamic ke.. atau macam blog2 personal ke (yg orang melayu tulis)..

aku rasa MACAM BAGUS je letak menda2 tu dalam BI. aku puji la.. niat korang macam bagus..

tapi berapa kerat sangat la ORANG PUTEH nak masuk baca ko nyer english translated

text tu.. ni cth translation Quran:

1) yg ni omputeh:

The Believers are but a single Brotherhood: so make peace and reconciliation between your two (contending) brothers; and fear Allah, that ye may receive Mercy. [Al - Hujurat:10]

O ye who believe! let not some men among you laugh at others: it may be that the (latter) are better than the (former): nor let some women laugh at others: it may be that the (latter) are better than the (former): nor defame nor be sarcastic to each other, nor call each other by (offensive) nicknames: ill-seeming is a name connoting wickedness, (to be used of one) after he has believed: and those who do not desist are (indeed) doing wrong.[Al - Hujurat:11]

 

2) ini melayu (takot orang tak tau plak ni bahasa melayu)

Sesungguhnya orang2 mukmin adalah bersaudara kerana ini damaikanlah antara kedua orang saudaranya dan bertakwalah kepada Allah supaya kamu mendapat rahmat
[Al - Hujurat:10]

Hai orang2 yang beriman, janganlah suatu kaum mengolok2kan kaum lain (kerana) kemungkinan mereka (yg diperolok2an) lebih baik dari mereka (yang mengolok2an) danjangan pula wanita2 (mengolok2an) wanita2 lain (diperolok2an) kerana kemungkinan wanita2 (yang diperolok2an) lebih baik dari wanita (yg mengolok2an) dan janganlah kamu mencela dirimu sendiri dan janganlah kamu memanggil dengan gelar2 yg buruk. Seburuk2 panggilan ialah (panggilan) yang buruk sesudah iman. dan barangsiapa yg tidak bertaubat, maka mereka itulah orang yg zalim [Al - Hujurat:11]

p/s: bukan aku translate.. dari translation Quran

tgk dua contoh di atas.. pada aku ini contoh yg kurang best sbb yg omputeh pon senang gak

nak paham tapi sbb malas nak cari  contoh lain. so guna je la contoh ni..

tgk ayat omputeh tu.. kalau macam aku yg jahil ni..

tgk hadis2/ ayat Quran English.. terus first impression dah "alamak.. camne nak paham ni".

pastu baca ayat omputeh tu..tgk perkataan connoting.. desist ..dah kena bukak kamus( takde

la bukak btul2.. exaggeration je). kan ke senang tulis dalam BM.. terus instantaneously paham..

"ooh.. ini rupanya dia nak cakap"..

ini aku nak cakap sbb aku nak kasi tau tak sume orang ahli dalam Quran/Hadis dan kalau btul

korang ada matlamat / "missi" 'dakwah' etc.. tulis la dalam BM.. bukan je geng2 ko yg power je

baca site/artikel ko.. kalua orang bongok yg tak reti English .. tapi dia minat..

skali dia baca hadis /Quran English ko tu.. terus dia rasa "ish..bodoh aa aku ni..

menda ni pon takleh paham.. sure aku tersisih kalau geng ngan derang..takyah aa"..

takyah la nak berlagak terer BI.. tulis je dalam BM.. aku tau la korang kat US/UK/whatever..

sure byk sumber English..tapi ini aku tgk nak tulis KOMEN ke .. tazkirah ke pon nak

tulis dalam ENGLISH.. ingat nampak INTELLECTUAL la tu kalau tulis english..

note: teruskan la sesape taruk artikel hadis/ quran .. tapi TOLONG aa tulis BM kalau boleh..

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[4/4/04 8:23 pm]

recently.. (during the feministic fiasco).. I've stumbled upon a website..

apparent written by a male-superiority activist..

as I browsed through his blog..

I asked myself a question..  "hey adlee.. I've seen this joke before"..

further browsing answer my question :a link to Maddox..

this guy is obviously a Maddox fan and it is very VISIBLE through his writing..

why I'm pissed: I'm pissed because this guy tries to copy the way maddox writes..

but his jokes are NOT FUNNY.. I'm a sensible guy.. I can even laugh at a teen-flick-ish comedy

movie.. but reading his site.. not even a minor grin can be spotted around my mouth area..

instead.. my face turns its expression from 'normal' to 'disgruntled' just by looking at his

website.. and his non-humorous entries are so trivial it's not even worth mentioning..

being a guy who doesn't usually gives a shit about people.. I thought..

"ala.. biarlah mamat ni buat lawak cam @#$%@.. malas aa nak masuk dah site dia"

but 2 weeks ago.. I flipped out when I saw him repeating THE SAME joke that

Maddox did.. on a picture..

being a fan .. I did what I think I should : email this guy and tell him stop making a fool of himself

and save the world from his moronic-humor.

scouting around his site.. I found a "contact me" link.. so I emailed him..and HE REPLIED!

our emails are as follows (mine in normal .. his in italic).

p/s: my name is John Doe in the email

1) hey dude,

I'm just a normal guy browsing websites..
and I happen to stumble on yours one day (imcp.blogspot.com) <-- his lame site
reading the contents of your site..
it becomes apparent to me that you're a die-hard fan of his majesty Maddox..
for I am a fan too.. seeing the materials in your site makes my mind ponder..
is he trying to worship maddox.. or is he trying to make a fool out of himself by
repeating punchlines used by Maddox almost identically..

I totally understand that your site is PERSONAL and
you have complete right to publish whatever you want on your site..
and if I don't like it.. I can shove my foot up my own ass and never enter your site again..
but as a fan to a fan advice : stop making a fool of yourself by copying his jokes totally out
of context..
Maddox is the poster-boy for rebellious attitude..
and rebelliousness is spontaneous..
make up your own jokes..

don't take this personally.

trivia: don't diss me as a normal guy..
I use to have up to 70 hits per day to maddox's page (not as much nowadays)

 

i) dear john the "female deer", <-- hahahahhaha lawak gell.. ahakzzz

wow, you're my 1st actual feedback from someone other than my close circle of friends who regularly visit the site. but hey look, I ain't gonna say thanks or post a hate-mail section like maddox as a response. I just couldn't be bothered since I'm too goddamn lazy. yes, I'll admit I use some of his punchlines but the only reason is because I like 'em!! rather than become a "true wannabe" like some sites, I'm just "adopting his style" of writing for now and as time goes by, I'll develop and evolve my own (not that I don't have one, but I'm using his temporarily to improve).

do notice that while I enjoy his jokes and his entries, at the same time I always try to make sure that the nature of my posts differ from him. while maddox complains and brags abt many things (the pattern is now becoming kinda repetitive if you notice), my entries are usually either abt a reflection of a recent event, an argument(kind of debate-oriented) and only SOMETIMES do I complain. not EVERY SINGLE joke I made was inspired by maddox himself. some are from books I read, stories I watch or other web sites (like the ones I've posted as links on the site). and as far as the repeated jokes which are out of the context...bear in mind that the jokes may be the same but I'm trying to relate it with my own entry.
that's all I've got to say. since you're the 1st "outsider response", I think I'll prolly mention this mail sometime in the future in my FAQs section (question: are you a maddox wannabe?). and relax, I really couldn't be bothered to make you famous by including your e-mail add in it. thanks though for giving me a wake up call so as I wouldn't repeat the same mistakes of becoming another maddox wannabe. unlike maddox who sometimes is seen as a pussy who can't handle some criticism, despite my inflated ego known by close associates, I still take criticism no matter how harsh it can be if it could only make me better. and unless you tick me off (in some way or another, not saying you are right now), I'm not exactly a rude person like maddox as you might think. in any case, do continue criticizing the site from time to time (not that I'm giving you any special permission or anything) so I could find more flaws and remedy them. now go away.


the handsome & irresponsible,
imcp
 

2) first of all, thanks for replying so promptly..

I appreciate the john "female deer" pun .. although as you may already notice with your superior intelligence that john doe is not my name.. john doe is just a metaphor for an unknown guy .don't need my reminding to know that huh?

well dude.. actually I don't wanna be hostile or anything..
but I just wanted to comment on several stuff you said ..
first of all ..you said you are just adopting maddox's writing pattern.. just as of now (or
for some time in the future) until you develop your own style of writing..
ooh.. does that mean YOU DON'T have a writing style of your own write now..
i wonder how do you write essays and stuff? must be hard writing like Maddox in your
English 100 class.. ooh what's that? you do have your own writing style?
then for CRYING OUT LOUD write using your own style dammit!

yes.. though I do admit you do have your own materials..
(because I don't think is bothered by some of the things that you covered)
but what I want to point of in the "out of context" comment before is your jokes
are NOT FUNNY. I guess this comment is hard for you to comprehend because it seems
time and time again you continue to apply the same kind of punchline in a "my jokes-are-from
maddox-so-it-is-automatically-cool" kinda way

yes.. do mention my email on your FAQ or whatever you want to call it..
I am not disturbed about it.. because from the way you're writing.. you need all the attention
you can get..
and I do appreciate you not mentioning my email address in your "FAQ" section because
I don't want MY popularity to get to your side.. my my.. we don't want that to happen do we?

some of your comments about maddox.. about him being a "pussy" shows
that you don't really understand him.. (although i do agree some of his jokes recently are repetitive)
but you saying you will try not to be a typical WANNABE shows that you are a wannabe..
(perhaps you don't understand this now.. but you will later.. take your time)

well.. I hope I've ticked you off because I like to tick people off..
next time you need a lesson to write originally but a maddox-kinda-way..
email me.. and I'll send you a first class lesson like this one..

not handsome but cool nonetheless,
john "female deer"
 

ii) hello mr. "female deer",
hahahaha. nice response. it's been awhile since I've met someone who actually tries to irritate me. sorry bub, but unfortunately I'm an mcp and I've already gotten used to women hating/despising/loathing me so after all these years I just couldn't be bothered. and yes, I do know what "john doe" means you idiot. but thanks for wasting your time to explain anyways.

abt my writing style...do note I'm not a native speaker and heck I'm not even a American. I'm a foreigner currently studying business in Indiana and since English is only my second language, you must admit that my flair of language is considerably good (perhaps even better) than any average American. still, like you said my style of writing lacks "originality" and having only experience in writing academic materials, do understand that the entries on the site itself can be considered my first time writing in a "non-formal way". FYI, you can actually notice my "true" writing style from some of the earlier posts which involve my own personal reflections which completely contrast that of maddox's. and since all of my entries are wide in variety (some might be considered sappy, sometimes offensive or downright ridiculous) I guess we can't actually say that my writing style is EXACTLY like maddox now can we?
as for the jokes, I don't know abt you but I happen to appreciate almost every kind of humor there is. fart jokes? ridiculous exaggerations? toilet humor? I love 'em. but at the same time, I do keep in mind that there are ppl who just can't seem to find my jokes funny (e.g. yourself) but I just couldn't care less. so I find it funny and you don't. BIG FUCKING DEAL. it's still not gonna change the fact that I chuckle everytime I read/see the same jokes and it sure as hell won't change the fact that you probably lack a sense of humor (at least by MY standards). hell, I laugh out loud just by watching cartoon shows like South Park, I.M Weasel (no kidding) and Family Guy. most of my peers find it odd because they thought those shows weren't funny. 
  and as far as you claiming that I don't understand maddox, here's some news. I DON'T CARE WHO OR WHATEVER THE FUCK HE IS. why in the blue hell would I want to understand him anyways? I just think he's funny and I like his jokes. I don't give the slightest care if he's an attention-seeking whore (probably like myself) or if he's some rebellious poster boy venting out his anger in his every single entry. to me, maddox's site is no different than the other sites I put on my links section (check out Acts of Gord btw. I actually laughed till my tears came out). I find them funny. there. end of story.
oh well, at least it seems you're being honest with me with your criticism (at least I hope you are). it's been only a month since I started the site (some of the older entries were transferred from my MySpace) so I'm still doing what I can to improve the site in all areas while juggling with my classes and all. just give me some time goddammit. anyways thanks for the response and I hope to hear s'more from you...
the handsome and irresponsible,
IMCP 

comment: usually I don't like listing real links to sites (like the comment about politics etc)

but I'd like to list the address to his website (i repeat:imcp.blogspot.com) so anybody

who came across mine can check it out for yourself and if you think I'm wrong..

 you can come to my room and give me a knuckle treatment (also known as penumbuk).

I don't want to comment about our engaging conversation in the email... it is self explanatory.

I just want to point out that if you want to write, no matter how weak you are..

 write originally. Don't go around copying other people's

style and jokes.. the way they pulled it off (the jokes) and the way you are retelling it are

not the same and that makes a lot of difference. Like yours truly, I don't really know how to

write well, I bet if people proof-reads all my entries there are tones of grammar / word choice /

sentence structure mistakes.

Second lesson: don't care what people say on their PERSONALSITE so much

(I mistake that I did) because when you're engaged a heated argument with people.. at the end

of the day.. YOU ARE the LOSER because it is your fault starting the argument.. and it is

THEIR BUSINESS what they put in their websites.

trivia: notice in his email (and his website) that this guy is a "bloody debater" and as I

proved in my previous entries.. debaters are ASS-WIPES and shouldn't be taken seriously..

(the same should be said to RUGGERS and BAND members).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[9/4/04 1:22 am]

wah wah ..rajin seyh post pagi2..

bukan sebab rajin la buduh.. saje aku tak rasa nak tido lagi..so aku tulis la something..

(wah wah dah mula ada ciri2 BLOG FANATIC..)

menda yg aku nak cakap ni pon dah lama aku perati..

tapi saje tanak tulis..

sbb aku nak perhatikan lagi kebodohan2 manusia..

ternyata manusia bodoh (kecuali aku)..

ari ni aku nak cakap pasal tendency sesetengah orang nak bincang menda2 fiksyen

lebih dari jalan cerita.. kadang2 peristiwa sebenar pon ada gak..

menda ni slalu giler aku nampak..

tak kira la.. menda tu buku ke.. movie ke.. katun ke..

menda ni slalu berlaku kalau sesuatu cerita tu ada 'cult following'..

pastu orang2 BONGOK macam ni la akan bukak topik2 perbincangan menda2 yg

tak diberitahu oleh penulis..

pastu buat gaya macam derang ni lagi PANDAI dari pengarang la pulak..

serius aku rasa nak pelempang sekor2..

contoh: aku banyak contoh lain.. tapi aku nak pilih contoh katun anime Naruto..

(sebab baru2 ni aku ada terjumpa message board yg discuss menda ni)..

dalam katun tu. ada 2 karekter.. Kakashi ngan Gai (derang ni ninja..pastu derang rival)..

pastu ada mamat BONGOK bukak thread ..

"Kakashi VS Gai.. who wins the most?" <-- or something of sorts

dalam cite katun tu (anime and manga) mmg ada cakap yg derang ni rival.. dah lawan byk kali..

Gai menang lebih satu dari Kakashi.. tapi tak cakap la derang lawan macam mana sume..

pastu mamat yg stat discussion tu lagi mau tanya..(dalam English la)

"eh korang.. Kakashi lawan Gai.. ko rasa macam mana Gai menang lebih satu tu ye?"

dalam ati aku.. dah pikir "kan manga ada tunjuk satu..dia lawan ooh-som je.. maybe yg lain2 tu

assume lawan macam biasa je la..takkan tu pon orang nak layan kot"

skali aku tgk2.. 2-3 PAGE orang balas..

sume nak BUAT BIJAK.. (slalunya POMPUAN je buat bijak..tapi ni laki pon ada)..

"aku rasa Gai menang lebih sbb dia ada hikmat XXXX la.."

"eh..mana ada.. aku rasa Kakashi  la cool..sbb dia ada kuasa XXXX.. dah la hensem LOL"

aku: "meh aku penyepak sorang2 pakai kuasa XXX aku nak"..

comment: aku rasa BODO PIANG aa sape2 buat menda macam ni..

sume menda2 yg ada cult following mesti ada punya la menda2 camni..

Star Wars ke.. X Files ke.. Kisah Kura2 dan Arnab ke..

apsal la ko pandai2 sangat nak bincang?

ko assistant pengarang tu ke?

kalau tak.. reti tak DUDUK DIAM2 pastu baca / tgk je la ape kesudahan komik/cerita tu..

pastu sesetengah menda yg dia tak cerita tu..

leave it there je la.. kalau nak assume pon..assume senyap2 dalam OTAK ko ..

takyah nak bukak thread kat anime/movie/book/whatever discussion..

byk menda lagi orang nak diskas.. 

yg aku pelik.. kalau sorang yg buat takpe..

ni orang lain .. bukan saje LAYAN.. malah buat skali..buduh

Back to Top

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[8/4/04]

disebabkan ada orang taruk karangan kat site dia..

aku pon nak taruk aa karangan kat site ..

Rural Revolution: The Communist Way                                                                     

As a local cadre for the CCP, my job is to mobilize the local peasant population in Jiangxi for a rural revolution. We must understand that a rural revolution requires elimination of feudal landownership, classification and mobilization of peasantry for land reform. This is not an easy task for a revolution requires meticulous investigation and thorough planning. Fortunately, comrade Mao has devised an investigation of the rural population in Xunwu county. The understanding of the report is crucial as a �Bible� for success of the revolution. Comrade Mao understood the value and potential of peasantry for revolution; he said �a single spark can start a prairie fire�. Thus, in the following passages, I will analyze Xunwu county, in terms of the social relations and the potential for a revolution based on comrade Mao�s report. I will also suggest my own interpretation and ideas to make such a revolution possible. I generally agree with what comrade Mao suggested in terms of economic and social relations, however, I will to provide some alterations to improve the efficiency of the revolution.

First, the geography of the area is important to ensure speedy mobilization of troops in order to spread the revolution. For example, Xunwu county is located at the intersection of three provinces (pp 47) which makes it perfect for revolution. The function of the area is also important. As comrade Mao said, the communist leadership failed to indicate a concrete work method because of their lack of understanding of a market town (pp 64), like Xunwu. Recent economic trends are also important. For instance, Xunwu City is ideal for revolution because the people were most prosperous during the Imperial times. They recently experience decline in trade (pp 65), and the city is a place where the competition between local handicraft and capitalist products are fierce (pp 66). Thus the ideology of a revolt against the capitalist and a classless society would certainly appeal to them.

One of the important steps in creating a rural revolution is classifying the society. Classification of society is imperative to ensure easy mobilization of allies and the understanding of the target groups to focus the spread of propagandistic ideas. Classification of the urban areas should be done as thoroughly as that of the rural areas and should not be overlooked. As comrade Mao mentioned, about 71 percent of the population of Xunwu City consists of peasants and artisans (pp 116). The working class constitutes 87 percent of the population and is ruled by the remaining population which includes landlords, merchants and religious leaders (pp 118). This scenario shows that even in an urban environment, peasants and workers are still a majority and contributes to the mobilization of people towards the revolution. Hired hands, manual labor, loafers (jobless people) and prostitutes may represent a significant number of people and should not be neglected. In Xunwu City, loafers and prostitutes contribute 16 percent of the city population (pp 116). Social mobility is almost non-existence although you can rise to the ranks to become a �gentlemen�, which is cordially respected (page 76). Student groups are not classified; I think this should be considered since they have the potential to play an important role to lead the revolution, although in Xunwu City most of the students are still in the middle or lower primary (pp 191). The number of prostitutes, loafers and merchants in the city should be analyzed more carefully because they represent the current economic status of the people in the city. This is because they are related to excess money which implies more wealth.

The understanding of the land relationship in the rural society is the most important part of the planning and execution of a rural revolution because if the sentiment towards the landlord is not favorable, then the revolution will be successful and vice-versa. The classification of the rural population is needed to define the ally and the enemy. Comrade Mao classified the rural population as landlords (which include large, middle and small), rich, middle and poor peasants, manual workers, hired hands and loafers. A large fraction of peasantry (and workers) in an area would ensure an easy mobilization of people against the feudal landlord. For example, in Xunwu the landlord class makes up 6.5 percent of the rural population and the peasantry class form about 92.5 percent of the rural society. The remaining consists of hired hands, loafers and laborers (pp 122). We should try to understand on how to classify these classes as allies or enemies towards the revolution. The most commonsensical answer would be: let the poor peasants decide who they want to choose as enemies. The Communist should follow their decision in order to get their support in implementing the rural revolution. The landlord class is an �automatic� choice as enemies but how are we going to classify the rich peasants? As comrade Mao states, in the eyes of the poor peasants, the rich peasants are just as exploitive as the landlords (pp 156) and thus should be included as enemies of the revolution. I agree with that notion. Comrade Mao continued to specify the large, middle and small landlords and the peasantry (pp 152-158) and the various classes of poor peasants, which is pivotal for better understanding of the class struggle. Comrade Mao went on to list extreme degrees of exploitation that these peasants endure which includes ridiculously high rents, interest rates and taxes (pp 161-183). These atrocities towards the peasants led to highly desperate measures such as selling their children (pp 17-179). This injustice should be analyzed thoroughly before initiating a rural revolution because their hate towards the landlord will translate into involvement in the rural revolution and is highly advantageous to the Communist cause.

Land redistribution plays a vital part in a rural revolution because it is the outcome of the revolution. Out of the four suggested methods of land redistribution (pp 197-198), I agree with the one opted by the Xunwu government which is the per-capita land distribution. I also agree with the method where peasants who are unable to farm, return the land to the government to be redistributed to the more efficient farmers (pp 198). I agree with the peasant�s choice of land distribution within a smaller unit like a village as opposed to township because it would hasten the process and also increase moral support of the peasantry towards the government. However, comrade Mao pointed out that land redistribution only takes two to seven days to complete (pp 205206), so that should not be a problem. Resistance towards land redistribution should not be handled with instant violence, but instead should be dealt with more tolerance and diplomacy, as shown by the Xunwu government (pp 208). As for loafers, prostitutes and non-peasants, I agree with comrade Mao; they only deserve to get land if they could provide production (pp 203, 211). I also agree to the abolishment of corporate land by the government (pp 204). The rural revolution seems to give birth to the over-liberation of women, which is a major concern to the peasantry because they lose precious labor. However, this part is not a major concern for the government because it seems that both the men and women enjoy their liberated status (pp 212-216).

One minor issue that needs to be addressed is the fact that these rural people still practice traditional beliefs. For example, they believe that it is unlucky to move due to bad luck to leave the ancestor�s tomb. This traditional beliefs although seem trivial, could influence the support. Heavy feeling of xenophobia is also present in the rural society (or just comrade Mao) where he classifies many daily items to be �foreign� and should also be thoroughly examined.

Wrapping up, a rural revolution is only possible by concentrated efforts by the peasantry and workers to overthrow the feudal landlords. It can only be done by delicate planning and observations, such as the one produced by comrade Mao. However, it seems that comrade Mao tends to oversimplify things like the social classification, which may be due to the lack of time and limited sources. One has to ask: Is the reality of the situation is as claimed by comrade Mao, or is it mere exaggeration of the truth to justify his actions?

comment: sure  orang pikir "ala mamat ni.. baru belajar Hist 100 dah berlagak nak cakap

pasal communism konon..ingat power aa tu..aku lagi tau"..

jawapan: mampus aku aa nak cakap pasal komunis ke.. nak cakap pasal kambing ke..

this is an essay for a class.. not my analysis about communism and revolution...

and just for saying's sake..(not bragging.. just as an assertion) I've read the Communist

Manifesto (the real book.. not ONLINE excerpts).. most of Lenin.. Stalin and Mao's published

(and unpublished) work.. and also the famous Red Book (of Mao's quotation).. so if you think

 I'm still not worthy to discuss communism.. I'd like to hear from anybody else who has

 BETTER understanding of communism than I do.

Back to Top

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[6/5/04 12:51 am]

hi.. ingatkan dah tanak tulis.. saje nak lepak for some time.. tapi lepas malam ni..

aku bgn tido terus rasa nak tulis pasal ni...

yes.. malam ni aku nak tulis pasal 'finale' Friends dan jugak pasal the whole series itself..

Why I care: Friends has span through a decade of airtime starting from 1994. I don't know

what season it is in.. but I would guess it would be in the 10th season (don't bother to correct

me). Not many sitcoms get through 10 years of airtime.. another memorable one is

Happy Days with the kick-ass Henry Winkler as the cool Fonzy.

Tonight is its BIG finale and NBC estimates around 45 million viewers tuned in.

Why I hate that: well.. I wouldn't have cared so much if there weren't so many viewers

tuned in and the fact that NBC charges 2 MILLION dollars per 30 seconds of commercial

during that slot of airtime and also the fact that they're releasing the DVD on the finale (+ pilot.

wah wah untungnya) in 5 days.

I hate people being exploited and for me Friends fans have been exploited for waaay too long.

Don't get me wrong.. I've watched Friends at the beginning until maybe the 2nd or 3rd season

and I even still remember the pilot episode (pilot = first episode for the unannounced). 

BUT I gave myself a reality check after I found the plot to be INTRIGUINGLY repetitive. Mula2

Rachel hook up ngan Ross.. pastu break.. pastu hook up balik (and I don't know how many

times that happen until today's episode).. and these guys get paid 1 MILLION DOLLARS EACH

PER EPISODE just for that because you dumbasses support the show. There's a GOOD

mention in VH1 about sitcoms that "jumped the shark" (meaning losing creative ideas to

elaborate the story.. so they do an outrageous thing *like Fonzy jumping over a shark

in Happy Days when the series started its slump*). They say one indication about sitcoms (

including Friends) jumping the shark is when it uses celebrity cameos. well.. I never watched

a newer Friend series WITH a celebrity in it but I know it HAS used celebrity cameos.

(that is self explanatory).

aku tak kisah la kalau pompuan nak tgk Friends.. pompuan mmg suka pon menda2 'sweet..

berbunga2 serta setiakawan.' tapi kalau laki tgk.. (including yours truly at first).. aku rasa laki

tu patut rasa dia manusia paling loser dalam dunia ni. There are MUCH MORE kick ass

tv in the US.. watch something like The Shield.. Nip/Tuck.. 24 .. those are quality tv. and I hate

it that the fact the finale is SUCH A BIG F*****NG deal. mampos aa kalau nak finale pon..

nak sedih2... nak guling2 sambili menangis boleh pegi mampus. I think regardless of what

those guys (the cast) said that they're sad and all.. in the end.. they are the winners because

they pocketed their hefty paycheck and you LOSERS out there

(not to mention those who bought the DVDs) just lost days and hours of your pathetic life

feeling bad and crying while watching the useless series. Heck.. I even think the cast feels

good that the series ended because now the can focus on the 'careers' (assuming they have

one other than this series). I feel good upon myself because I spent the last 5 hours

SLEEPING and knowing that 45 million more lost 2 hours of their life doing nothing

beneficial while I was sleeping (maybe more including their discussion about

the finale and also watching the Leno special on Friends midnight).  ZzZzZzz.....

- sape pegi beli DVD dia minggu depan mmg nak kena penyepak